Co-owner Darren Swanson says the "bucks" part of his establishment's name refers to aboriginal culture, not coffee culture.
"Aboriginal men were called bucks and we're also Haidas, so Haidabucks," said Swanson. "The three aboriginal partners are all Haidas. That's how we came up with the name."
Swanson says his restaurant has a longhouse façade and looks nothing like a Starbucks. HaidaBucks is a 60-seat full service restaurant offering everything from coffee to quesadillas to seafood specials.
Officials at the coffee conglomerate say they will take legal action to stop the "confusing variation" of their name.
"I couldn't see a StarBucks opening here for another 150 years…it's a pretty isolated place," Swanson says refering to the town of Masset, population 1,500.
"Lots of men out there are called Haida bucks. It's kind of our pet name."
I realize that Starbucks has to carefully police its trademark or risk losing it ... but this is sort of nuts. That's a picture of the restaurant above.
Posted by Clive Thompson at April 27, 2003 12:25 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/299
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Starbucks fights "Haidabucks":
To which point does the public have to fund the egos and wallets of the corporations that want to control the lives of the overly-forgiving consumer?
Do I really care that a company in B.C. might share part or all of Starbucks name? I mean I am quite confident that I can differentiate between the worldwide megacolossussuperforce,caffiene-pushing,minimum-wage champions or three fat guys in a lawnmower shed trying to make a buck.
OOPs I said "buck".
Posted by: Jim at April 29, 2003 11:13 AM
Watch that trademark infringement!
Posted by: Clive at May 4, 2003 3:40 PM
Posted by: Online Casino at January 16, 2004 2:57 AM
Posted by: julia at January 24, 2004 8:18 PM
Te capiam, cunicule sceleste! - I'll get you, you wascally wabbit!
Posted by: watersports stories at July 14, 2004 11:09 AM
Post a comment
To which point does the public have to fund the egos and wallets of the corporations that want to control the lives of the overly-forgiving consumer?
Do I really care that a company in B.C. might share part or all of Starbucks name? I mean I am quite confident that I can differentiate between the worldwide megacolossussuperforce,caffiene-pushing,minimum-wage champions or three fat guys in a lawnmower shed trying to make a buck.
OOPs I said "buck".
Posted by: Jim at April 29, 2003 11:13 AM
Watch that trademark infringement!
Posted by: Clive at May 4, 2003 3:40 PM
Nice site. thx.
Posted by: Online Casino at January 16, 2004 2:57 AM
Posted by: julia at January 24, 2004 8:18 PM
Te capiam, cunicule sceleste! - I'll get you, you wascally wabbit!
Posted by: watersports stories at July 14, 2004 11:09 AM