Celebrity math

One hazard of being an attractive starlet is that many people assume you're not that smart. This, however, is no problem for Danica McKellar, a 30-year-old former star of The Wonder Years and regular on The West Wing, because she's actually got documented proof of her brilliance: She's the author of the mathematical proof "Percolation and Gibbs states multiplicity for ferromagnetic Ashkin-Teller models on Z-squared" (PDF), which she cowrote while doing a degree at the University of California.
There's an excellent profile of her in the Science section of yesterday's New York Times, which tells the life-imitates-art story of when McKellar auditioned for the lead role in a San Diego production of the play Proof, in which a young woman claims to have solved a complex mathematical proof:
At an audition, the casting director asked about what she knew of math. Ms. McKellar said she was co-author of a mathematics proof.
"She went into a five-minute explanation," said Sam Woodhouse, the artistic director of the San Diego Repertory Theater. "Which was a stunning and mystifying five minutes."
McKellar even managed to talk about math during a Q&A in the current issue of Stuff magazine, in which she also appears in the cover wearing black lingerie:
Q: After [The Wonder Years], you attended UCLA, became a genius and published a paper on Percolation and Gibbs states multiplicity for ferromagnetic Ashkin-Teller models on Z2. I really enjoyed the part on infinite occupied clusters.
A: It's really complicated and not that interesting to most people.
Heh. Perhaps the coolest and weirdest thing about McKellar is that she actually gets fan mail about math. High-school kids email her complicated math questions; she walks them through the answers on her web site. Check it out and bone up on your probability theory, puzzles about rates, and the physics of tossing a baseball from the outfield to the catcher.
Posted by Clive Thompson at July 20, 2005 11:13 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1272
Posted by: wu-ping at July 20, 2005 2:31 PM
Posted by: Clive at July 20, 2005 2:46 PM
I know this is a feel-good post and all, and that the point of it is how cool it is for this girl to be both famous for being a hot actress and all, and at the same time be smarter than a lot of us...
but if I wanted to be grumpy, I could be offended that... "well, so this is a story about a girl who is pretty and famous and STILL smart? Yeah, real bomb blast". See what I mean?
I'm not VERY grumpy, though, so I'll just be happy for her. And this blog is great, by the way.
Posted by: eke at July 21, 2005 10:52 AM
Oh, Winnie Cooper, all grown up. The math section on her site is very cool. I couldn't get to "Captain RibMan", a comic she wrote? Anyone hear of it? [mmmm. ribs....]
Clive's got something for gender-bias-busting babes named Danica.
Posted by: jason at July 21, 2005 12:59 PM
Man, those picks are something else....that's little Winnie Cooper?
Posted by: Uncle Rob at July 21, 2005 7:04 PM
Eke: Heh, yeah, I know what you mean. The mere fact that I have found this blogworthy indicates that on some level I'm implicitly endorsing a) the idea that attractive chicks are not smart, and b) the idea that it is unremarkable when a person who isn't considered conventionally attractive is smart.
But, whaddya gonna do: The Wonder Years, math proofs -- who could resist?
Jason, indeed, there's a Danica thread going through the blog recently, eh?
Rob, oh yes.
Posted by: Clive at July 21, 2005 9:00 PM
Geek lust objects: Danica McKellar ... the new Natalie Portman?
Posted by: Steve at July 22, 2005 1:14 PM
Posted by: Clive at July 22, 2005 1:55 PM
Clive, have you blogged anything about Heddy Lamar, the Austrian-born glamour queen/mathematician?
Posted by: Erik Weissengruber at July 28, 2005 11:38 AM
Posted by: Clive at July 28, 2005 12:40 PM
Post a comment
Danica rocks! :-)
Posted by: wu-ping
at July 20, 2005 2:31 PM
Seriously, eh?
Posted by: Clive
at July 20, 2005 2:46 PM
I know this is a feel-good post and all, and that the point of it is how cool it is for this girl to be both famous for being a hot actress and all, and at the same time be smarter than a lot of us...
but if I wanted to be grumpy, I could be offended that... "well, so this is a story about a girl who is pretty and famous and STILL smart? Yeah, real bomb blast". See what I mean?
I'm not VERY grumpy, though, so I'll just be happy for her. And this blog is great, by the way.
Posted by: eke
at July 21, 2005 10:52 AM
Oh, Winnie Cooper, all grown up. The math section on her site is very cool. I couldn't get to "Captain RibMan", a comic she wrote? Anyone hear of it? [mmmm. ribs....]
Clive's got something for gender-bias-busting babes named Danica.
Posted by: jason
at July 21, 2005 12:59 PM
Man, those picks are something else....that's little Winnie Cooper?
Posted by: Uncle Rob
at July 21, 2005 7:04 PM
Eke: Heh, yeah, I know what you mean. The mere fact that I have found this blogworthy indicates that on some level I'm implicitly endorsing a) the idea that attractive chicks are not smart, and b) the idea that it is unremarkable when a person who isn't considered conventionally attractive is smart.
But, whaddya gonna do: The Wonder Years, math proofs -- who could resist?
Jason, indeed, there's a Danica thread going through the blog recently, eh?
Rob, oh yes.
Posted by: Clive
at July 21, 2005 9:00 PM
Geek lust objects: Danica McKellar ... the new Natalie Portman?
Posted by: Steve
at July 22, 2005 1:14 PM
Heh.
Posted by: Clive
at July 22, 2005 1:55 PM
Clive, have you blogged anything about Heddy Lamar, the Austrian-born glamour queen/mathematician?
Posted by: Erik Weissengruber
at July 28, 2005 11:38 AM
Indeed -- last spring, I blogged about Lamarr under the headline "Incredibly hot chick invents mobile phone". She's crazy smart too!
Posted by: Clive
at July 28, 2005 12:40 PM