LOL: Study shows short-forms comprise only 2.4% of teenage IMs
Parents and grammar nazis tend to flip out at instant messaging -- because they worry the technology is ruining kids' ability to write correctly. All those short forms! WTF! OMG! We're breeding a nation of illiterates!
So I was intrigued to find a study of teenage IM chat that found that nu-wave short forms comprise a mere 2.4 per cent of their communications. University of Toronto professor Sali Tagliamonte spent two years examining the IM chats of 71 teenagers -- collecting over 1 million words. The result? Behold the periodicity of these following common short forms:
Frequency per 100,000 words:
LOL -- "laughing out loud": 195
omg -- "oh my god": 107
brb -- "be right back": 31
ttyl -- "talk to you later: 30
btw -- "by the way": 22
nvm -- "never mind": 7
gtg -- "gotta go": 5
np -- "no problem: 4
nm -- "not much": 3
lmao -- "laughing my ass off": 2
Hardly the sort of linguistic rot we've been led to believe, eh? "There's a misconception this is sloppy and ruinous," as Tagliamonte told the Toronto Star. "It's not. It demonstrates kids are really creative with their language. It's a medium that lends itself to brevity so they have developed these short forms."
Mind you, I'm not suggesting that too many kids these days aren't blithering illiterates. I regularly receive bleak, bleak reports from friends of mine who teach high school or even first-year college classes. But me, I'm old-school: I blame whole language. What a total train-wreck of a pedagogical approach.
Posted by Clive Thompson at October 02, 2006 09:49 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1576
Nice post - it's good to see some science defending kids and counteracting age-related stereotypes. I wonder what the rate of crossover for these things into other forms of communication is. I've heard a few WTFs pop up in conversation, but it seems to me that these abbreviations are IM-specific language modifications made to make IM a more immediate conversational experience.
But even if kids these days are "blithering illiterates" despite the results of this study, why blame whole language? Aren't there bigger problems with our educational system that are likely to be the root of the problem? How about the shortage of qualified teachers as a result of (among other things) teacher salaries failing to keep up inflation for the past decade?
Posted by: lanier at October 9, 2006 3:45 PM
Post a comment
Nice post - it's good to see some science defending kids and counteracting age-related stereotypes. I wonder what the rate of crossover for these things into other forms of communication is. I've heard a few WTFs pop up in conversation, but it seems to me that these abbreviations are IM-specific language modifications made to make IM a more immediate conversational experience.
But even if kids these days are "blithering illiterates" despite the results of this study, why blame whole language? Aren't there bigger problems with our educational system that are likely to be the root of the problem? How about the shortage of qualified teachers as a result of (among other things) teacher salaries failing to keep up inflation for the past decade?
Posted by: lanier
at October 9, 2006 3:45 PM