Soldier-robot love

I've blogged and written journalism regularly about people's emotional relationships with robots and artificial life forms. But the Washington Post just published one of the best things I've ever read on the subject -- a feature article by Joel Garreau on the emotional relationships between today's soldiers and the many robots they use to keep themselves alive.
It opens up with a story about how an army roboticist was testing a clever new design for a robot modeled on centipede -- which explodes land mines by intentionally stepping on them:
At the Yuma Test Grounds in Arizona, the autonomous robot, 5 feet long and modeled on a stick-insect, strutted out for a live-fire test and worked beautifully, he says. Every time it found a mine, blew it up and lost a limb, it picked itself up and readjusted to move forward on its remaining legs, continuing to clear a path through the minefield.
Finally it was down to one leg. Still, it pulled itself forward. Tilden was ecstatic. The machine was working splendidly.
The human in command of the exercise, however -- an Army colonel -- blew a fuse.
The colonel ordered the test stopped.
Why? asked Tilden. What's wrong?
The colonel just could not stand the pathos of watching the burned, scarred and crippled machine drag itself forward on its last leg.
This test, he charged, was inhumane.
Awesome. And the article gets better and better -- and more and more surreal -- from there on in. Garreau reports on soldiers who award "purple hearts" to their bomb-defusing robots that get injured; soldiers who describe in details the personality quirks of their 'bots ("Sometimes you get a robot that comes in and it does a little dance, or a karate chop, instead of doing what it's supposed to do"); soldiers that take their robots on furlough, to give them "rest".
As Garreau points out, the army's use of robots has a cyborgic element: It's sometimes hard to tell where the robot ends and the human begins. He tells the story of a Predator drone pilot who crash-landed a damaged Predator, and in the seconds before the crash, unconsciously lunged beneath his seat: "He had bonded so tightly with the machine hundreds of miles away that he was searching for the lever that would allow him to eject."
(Thanks to Slashdot for this one!)
Posted by Clive Thompson at May 09, 2007 01:41 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1660
Hmmmmm- Soldiers can easier humanize a (nonhuman) robot than the human other.
Posted by: Navidnak at May 9, 2007 8:16 PM
I think that's exactly it: we crave connection, even when we're forced to disconnect, so we look for it where we can, even in the ranks of robots - as long as they're on our side.
It's amazing how much more human we become when we're supposed to deny our humanity.
Posted by: btl35 at May 10, 2007 12:02 AM
Yes, precisely ... a very strange limit case showing how these psychological dynamics work, eh?
Posted by: Clive at May 10, 2007 11:23 AM
Posted by: Navidnak
"Hmmmmm- Soldiers can easier humanize a (nonhuman) robot than the human other."
=======
Maybe robots which help safely clear roadside bombs display more humanity than the kind of people who set them.
Posted by: fencerchica at May 11, 2007 11:27 AM
I find the idea that they want to add "faces" to these bots really fascinating. I wonder if it's their neurons subconsciously missing a mirror?
Posted by: teenerweiner at May 18, 2007 3:09 PM
The story of the Army colonel being emotionally moved by the plight of a bomb-detonating robot combined with the mention of soldiers that take robots out on furlough caused this bizarre scene to pop into my head:
Setting: Entrance to a brothel. We see a Prostitute, a U.S. Army Lieutenant and a squat Robot with 8 spider-like legs.
Prostitute: Let me get this straight. You want me...to do it...with that weird machine?
Lieutenant: Listen, honey, that weird machine saved my life!
Prostitute: Well...I suppose for double the money, I might give it a go.
She lightly touches the top of the Robot, which starts shaking while emitting excited R2D2-like sounds.
Posted by: peternuss at May 25, 2007 12:30 AM
Post a comment
Hmmmmm- Soldiers can easier humanize a (nonhuman) robot than the human other.
Posted by: Navidnak
at May 9, 2007 8:16 PM
I think that's exactly it: we crave connection, even when we're forced to disconnect, so we look for it where we can, even in the ranks of robots - as long as they're on our side.
It's amazing how much more human we become when we're supposed to deny our humanity.
Posted by: btl35
at May 10, 2007 12:02 AM
Yes, precisely ... a very strange limit case showing how these psychological dynamics work, eh?
Posted by: Clive
at May 10, 2007 11:23 AM
Posted by: Navidnak
"Hmmmmm- Soldiers can easier humanize a (nonhuman) robot than the human other."
=======
Maybe robots which help safely clear roadside bombs display more humanity than the kind of people who set them.
Posted by: fencerchica
at May 11, 2007 11:27 AM
I find the idea that they want to add "faces" to these bots really fascinating. I wonder if it's their neurons subconsciously missing a mirror?
Posted by: teenerweiner
at May 18, 2007 3:09 PM
The story of the Army colonel being emotionally moved by the plight of a bomb-detonating robot combined with the mention of soldiers that take robots out on furlough caused this bizarre scene to pop into my head:
Setting: Entrance to a brothel. We see a Prostitute, a U.S. Army Lieutenant and a squat Robot with 8 spider-like legs.
Prostitute: Let me get this straight. You want me...to do it...with that weird machine?
Lieutenant: Listen, honey, that weird machine saved my life!
Prostitute: Well...I suppose for double the money, I might give it a go.
She lightly touches the top of the Robot, which starts shaking while emitting excited R2D2-like sounds.
Posted by: peternuss
at May 25, 2007 12:30 AM