Physicist discovers Mary Jane/Peter Parker the strongest tie in the Marvel social network

This is beyond awesome: Pablo Gleiser, a physicist, took 12,942 issues of various Marvel comics, traced all the connections between 6,486 different characters -- and produced a massive social-network map of the Marvel Universe.
Some of his findings? Superheroes have way more connections than villians -- which may help explain why they win so often. "Only heroes team up," Gleiser notes, "while villains do not." Superheroes are superconnectors; villians sit on the periphery of the social web. This, he theorizes, is probably due to the built-in rules that comic-book authors must follow. As he writes in his paper, the PDF of which you can download here:
We believe that the origin of this division is due to the fact that, although the Marvel Universe incorporates elements from fantasy and science-fiction the arguments of the stories were restricted by a set of rules established in the Comics Authority Code of the Comics Magazine Association of America. In particular, rule number five in part A of the code for editorial matter states that "Criminals shall not be presented so as to be rendered glamorous or to occupy a position which creates the desire for emulation ..."
With great power comes great responsibility. Speaking of which, Gleiser found that the single-strongest bond in the network -- i.e. the tie most commonly reiterated in Marvel plots -- is between Peter Parker and Mary Jane. ("A fact," he writes, "that shows that although the [Marvel Universe] deals mainly with superheroes and villians the most popular plot is a love story.") The next most-important superconnectors? The Thing, the Beast, Namor, and the Hulk.
That map above illustrates the sad plight of villians. It shows the strongest 300 links. The black dots are heroes -- most of which are nicely and tightly interconnected. The white dots are villians, which tend to be connected only to a black dot -- usually their sworn arch-enemy. (The grey dots are "other types of characters, such as people, gods or nodes with no classification.")
But here's a thought, fanboys. Network theory also predicts "the strength of weak ties": I.e. the fact that while superconnectors have lots of strong connections, the most interesting, creative and unpredictable social effects come from weak links -- connections between people only slightly joined. Does this hold true for the Marvel Universe? Are the stories in which those weak ties appear particularly intriguing, wacky, or unexpected than the ones that are characterized purely by strong ties? I want some grad student to tackle this one and get a PhD for it.
(Thanks to the New Scientist for this one!)
Posted by Clive Thompson at September 04, 2007 01:38 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1684
Am I being hopelessly unimaginative and uncool if I point out that these battles and relationships are fictional? Maybe the heroes have tighter connections because the creators centered entire series of comics around them, making them indispensable in a way that most villains could never be? Maybe if you have a world of superheroes, it's in your interest to show the occasional villain being vanquished, limiting his future utility in creating networks?
I'm sorry, the chart looks cool, but unless you're being satirical, I don't see the utility in tracking the interrelatedness of fictional superhero.
Does Dr. Gleiser have any conclusions about the fact that many superheroes never seemed to age over the decades that their series took place? Does this have any relevance in current gerontology? The fountain of youth is within our grasp!
Posted by: priceyeah at September 5, 2007 2:39 PM
Ahaahahaha!
Yeah, well, clearly the study is at least partly tongue in cheek. (The author's prose is tinder-dry.) Personally, I think it's mostly interesting as a way of seeing what the dictates of comic-book-conventions look like in the agregate, after decades of writers plumbing away at the task of writing stories. It's fun to examine any system, organic or artificial!
Posted by: Clive at September 5, 2007 2:58 PM
Posted by: Dusty Bear at September 11, 2007 12:13 PM
Yeah, there are clearly lots of exceptions to that rule. Or the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants!
I've never been clear at what point Magneto realized that having the adjective "Evil" in the group's name was bad PR and shortened it to "Brotherhood of Mutants". What year was that?
Posted by: Clive at September 12, 2007 11:25 AM
Hmm, I was always more of a Spidey fan, so I'm not so sure about the X-Men universe. I wiki'd the Brotherhood of Mutants only to find out they had several incarnations, including the Brotherhood of Those Who Will Inherit the Earth.
It's an interesting line of questioning, though. Given Magneto's history, he probably did not think of his cause as "evil," so why the name?
Posted by: Dusty Bear at September 12, 2007 12:35 PM
I don't think Marvel's writers were thinking too clearly about Magneto's internal state at that point. I might be wrong about his, but I think his past as a Holocaust survivor was retconned later on in the series ... so they probably weren't fully grokking his perception of himself.
Posted by: Clive at September 13, 2007 1:14 PM
Post a comment
Am I being hopelessly unimaginative and uncool if I point out that these battles and relationships are fictional? Maybe the heroes have tighter connections because the creators centered entire series of comics around them, making them indispensable in a way that most villains could never be? Maybe if you have a world of superheroes, it's in your interest to show the occasional villain being vanquished, limiting his future utility in creating networks?
I'm sorry, the chart looks cool, but unless you're being satirical, I don't see the utility in tracking the interrelatedness of fictional superhero.
Does Dr. Gleiser have any conclusions about the fact that many superheroes never seemed to age over the decades that their series took place? Does this have any relevance in current gerontology? The fountain of youth is within our grasp!
Posted by: priceyeah
at September 5, 2007 2:39 PM
Ahaahahaha!
Yeah, well, clearly the study is at least partly tongue in cheek. (The author's prose is tinder-dry.) Personally, I think it's mostly interesting as a way of seeing what the dictates of comic-book-conventions look like in the agregate, after decades of writers plumbing away at the task of writing stories. It's fun to examine any system, organic or artificial!
Posted by: Clive
at September 5, 2007 2:58 PM
Only heroes team up? Ummm, what about the Sinister Six?
Posted by: Dusty Bear
at September 11, 2007 12:13 PM
Yeah, there are clearly lots of exceptions to that rule. Or the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants!
I've never been clear at what point Magneto realized that having the adjective "Evil" in the group's name was bad PR and shortened it to "Brotherhood of Mutants". What year was that?
Posted by: Clive
at September 12, 2007 11:25 AM
Hmm, I was always more of a Spidey fan, so I'm not so sure about the X-Men universe. I wiki'd the Brotherhood of Mutants only to find out they had several incarnations, including the Brotherhood of Those Who Will Inherit the Earth.
It's an interesting line of questioning, though. Given Magneto's history, he probably did not think of his cause as "evil," so why the name?
Posted by: Dusty Bear
at September 12, 2007 12:35 PM
I don't think Marvel's writers were thinking too clearly about Magneto's internal state at that point. I might be wrong about his, but I think his past as a Holocaust survivor was retconned later on in the series ... so they probably weren't fully grokking his perception of himself.
Posted by: Clive
at September 13, 2007 1:14 PM