FREE counter and Web statistics from sitetracker.com
collision detection
content | discontent
send me yours
September 04, 2007
Cats need to navigate an obstacle to remember it














Here's a cool study: Alberta biologists appear to have demonstrated that spatial memory in cats is cemented not when a cat sees something -- but when it navigates around it. Merely perceiving something, for a cat, isn't enough.

In their experiment -- pictured above -- they had a cat step halfway over a small barrier, at which point they distracted it with food. They lowered the barrier while it was eating, but when the cat moved on, it still raised its hind legs, believing the barrier to still be there. This is the sort of behavior you'd expect, of course.

But then they repeated the experiment with a twist. This time, the cat was stopped at the point when it had seen the barrier -- but before it had stepped its front paws over it. Again, they lowered the barrier while the cat ate the food. But when the cat moved onwards, it didn't raise its hind legs high enough the clear the now-removed barrier. The cat had seen the barrier, but because it hadn't been forced to navigate it with its front paws, the barrier hadn't become part of its spatial memory.

As a story by Henry Fountain in today's New York Times notes:

"The movement of the forelegs does something unusual," Mr. McVea said. "It cements the memory of the obstacle." They had similar results using a barrier that the cat could feel but not see, demonstrating that visual cues were not necessary to create the memory.

Mr. McVea said most likely the brain's motor cortex, which sends signals to the muscles to initiate movements, was also sending signals to another part of the brain involved in mapping the environment.

Sylvain Fiset, a professor of psychology at the University of Moncton in New Brunswick, said the work suggested that the cognitive processes of cats were adaptable to circumstances and that they "use diverse neural pathways to remember different events."

I wonder how to what extent our brains work the same way. Some experiments with athletes navigating obstacles, for example, might reveal some neat things about the way we learn sports, gymnastics, and the all-important skill of wandering through your house in the pitch-dark without smashing your shins on furniture.

Posted by Clive Thompson at September 04, 2007 11:59 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1682

Comments

I simply love it when cats mess scientists minds up.

Posted by: gemp [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 4, 2007 12:33 PM

I agree! It's gotta be hard being a catologist. The cats are always playing mind games, pretending to sleep, sitting with their backs to you, etc.

Posted by: Clive [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 4, 2007 2:12 PM

Actually, for me it seems like an awful lot of what I know is housed more in the body than the mind (or more accurately, maybe, in the nerves rather than the brain). For instance, much of the work I do with tools in the art studio is much more guided by a learned "feel" than by consciously thinking about what to do. Then I thought about playing musical instruments and how much of that knowledge seems to held more in my hands… There are a lot of songs that I can't remember how to play if I try to work it out in my head… I couldn't just tell you the chords, but if I lay hands on a guitar they just come right out.

In fact, even on the computer, there's a lot of stuff that I only know how to do when my hands are on the actual keyboard. I was trying to teach my daughter how to code this summer and I found that if I stood back and tried to talk her through a process it was much harder than when I actually just laid hands to keyboard and demonstrated how to do it.

I've been fascinated for a long time by the idea of using the nerves in the body to augment thinking outside the brain.

Posted by: johntunger [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2007 11:20 AM

Yep, the whole "body intelligence" thing was Rodney Brooks' deal at MIT with Cog, the robot that learned by physically doing things, not by meditating on them. Nowadays very few folks who think about the nature of thinking believe it happens only in the brain ...

Keyboards, yep, I have so much muscle memory built up in them that it's why I can never really switch to Mac. They've got like 99% of the key commands, but I just sort of go berserk when I encounter the 1% they don't have.

Posted by: Clive [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 10, 2007 3:09 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

NOTE: If you posted a comment and you can't see it -- try refreshing your browser.


Remember me?