« PREVIOUS ENTRY
Self-counting coin jar!

The Dartfish Olympics

If you’ve been watching media coverage of the Olympics, you’ve probably seen Stromotion — that software that breaks an athlete’s fluid movements into stop-motion-style freeze-frames. The tres cool software is made by the Swiss company Dartfish, and apparently Olympians have been using it to train in an incredibly innovative way: They take a performance of a classic Olympian from the past and run it alongside their own, with both broken down into Stromotion frames. As the Associated Press reports, US pole vault star Toby Stevenson uses Dartfish to virtually “compete against” video of Sergey Bubka, the world record holder:

“I use it until smoke comes out of the machine. It’s great,” said Stevenson, who has secured a spot on the Olympic team.

Stevenson can review his practice jumps on a laptop within seconds of a vault. Within two hours of a track meet, he can watch himself on an LCD projector back at the hotel. Or he can have his day’s work burned onto a CD.

While Stevenson’s muscles tell him one thing, the digital video might reveal something else.

“It’s a big reason for my success,” Stevenson said. “I jump, and between every jump I watch my jump, and after practice I watch every jump on Dartfish.”

This reminds me of the idea of the “ghost” competition in many popular video games. I first encountered it in the original Mario Kart back in 1996: You could race around a track, and then do it again, competing against a recorded “ghost” version of yourself — to see if you could do it faster. Competing against your “ghost” — or that of a world-ranked competitor — is now a pretty common thing in many games, and it reminds me of how game innovations have constantly pioneered techniques that are transforming how we view, and play, real-world sports.

There’s even a debate about whether this is a good thing or not. Some famous judges — such as Cynthia Potter, NBC’s famous diving analyst — wonder whether Stromotion is harming the sport, because it’s encouraging judges to give demerits for things they normally wouldn’t see. As USA Today reports:

“With the naked eye, you don’t see these tiny little things that might be called deductions,” said Potter, as divers lined up for midday practice plunges at the Olympic venue Monday. “I don’t know if you’d even need judges if you could program all this into a computer.”

But, she says, “Human judges allow for artistic judgment — and it’s allowed divers to put personality in their dives.”

Of course, this isn’t an entirely new thing. The photo finish has been around for decades in many sports — and it’s caused huge controveries in everything from the 100-meter dash to greyhound racing. But modern media are likely to make things even stranger. I can easily envision the next few Olympics, when fans are getting personalized Stromotion streams sent to their mobile phones, which they can view and then vote on which athlete did the best dive.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

A long German word for “noticing when ads are being customized based on your surfing history”

Gay squid sex

“El Ajedrecista” — an analog chess-playing computer from 1912

Hacking the Model T

“How did you find my site?” and Vannevar Bush’s memex

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

May 20, 2011 » 02:28 PM

From Christopher Kennedy’s very droll book “Neitzsche’s Horse”.

July 28, 2010 » 07:35 AM
“Wr” - S

July 06, 2010 » 10:05 AM

My Xbox broke, and I was trying to Google some possible technical solutions, when I noticed that Google appears to be encouraging me to make a typo. I suppose it’s possible that Google’s algorithms know that typing “wont” instead of “won’t” would produce better results.

June 29, 2010 » 05:00 PM

On the other hand, when I tried the test for multitasking, I was pretty abysmal. I performed worse than people who identify themselves as heavy multitaskers, and those who identify as low multitaskers.

June 29, 2010 » 04:58 PM

I finally got around to trying out the interactive “test your distractability and multitasking” page at the New York Times, which they put up alongside their story earlier this month about how computer distractions are eroding our lives. 

According to the test, I guess I have good focus — I’m not very distractable! 

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson