The tailor as hacker

Thomas Mahon, the tailor for Prince Charles, has started a blog in which he discusses the art of creating a really nice “bespoke” — i.e. handmade and crafted to fit an individual body — suit. It’s hilariously funny and really informative; Mahon has an encyclopedic flair for explaining the subtleties of his craft. My favorite posting so far is where he discusses the difference between the “fused canvas” versus the “floating canvas”. The canvas, as it turns out, is part of a suit jacket: It’s the layer of cloth between the outer cloth and the inner silk lining, which is what helps the coat retain its shape. Machine-made, off-the-rack suits use a synthetic material for the canvas “which effectively turns to glue when heated”. But …

… with a proper, bespoke suit, the coat is canvassed by hand. Yes, we use a real piece of wool & mohair based canvas. And yes, it does take forever.

Why have a hand canvas? It looks better. With a fused coat, there’s no give. Where the outer cloth goes, the fused material goes, and vice-versa. They’re just machine-stuck together. There’s no synergy between the two.

But with a floating, hand canvas, there’s give. There’s synergy. The end result is the suit follows the contours of the body more naturally. There’s less surface tension. The fit looks more relaxed and elegant without compromising form.

The other great thing with a hand canvas is, if it isn’t put in absulutely, 100% correctly, it doesn’t hang properly.

As I’ve mentioned before, I’m a big fan of suits and ties, and have a stupidly large number of them. (Particularly for someone who works in a home office.) I always tend to freak out my geek friends when I show up wearing a suit at some technology or science event. Yet it always equally surprises me that geeks aren’t into suits.

After all, suits have many of the things that geeks particularly appreciate: Intense levels of engineering, an obsession with structural elegance, physics, totally wicked gear that’s used to create them, topographic geometry, and materials science that burrows right down to chemistry and — these days — nanotechnology. And when it comes to ties, my god, you’ve got the most awesomely realized application of knot theory on the planet. Perhaps most geeklike, the suit is, in essence, a role-playing device — a plus-5 armor vest eminently useful in plenty of situations. (For that matter, the corporate world is only slightly less mannered than the Society for Creative Anachronism, come to think of it.)

As for that stuff about a suit and tie not being comfortable … ah, don’t get me started. That’s an artifact of badly-fitting suits and badly-tied ties. When a suit is well fit and a tie well tied, they’re so sublimely comfortable that you can pretty much play basketball in them. Come to think of it, I have.

Anyway, that’s what struck me about Mahon’s blog: He has a hackerish attitude towards suits.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

The “Milky Way Transit Authority” map

Should automobile software be open-sourced?

My Bookforum review of Jaron Lanier’s “You Are Not A Gadget”

Molecular secrets of the “iron-plated snail”

Garry Kasparov, cyborg

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

January 31, 2010 » 07:29 PM
V. A. To me death seems to be an evil.
M. What, to those who are al­ready dead? or to those who must die?
A. To both.
M. It is a mis­ery, then, be­cause an evil?
A. Cer­tain­ly.
M. Then those who have al­ready died, and those who have still got to die, are both mis­er­able?
A. So it ap­pears to me.
M. Then all are mis­er­able?
A. Ev­ery one.

January 24, 2010 » 03:22 PM

One of the more interesting trends is family, which came in at number five. Specifically, discussion about family, moms, dads, daughters, etc. jumped during 2009. With Facebook users getting older, this isn’t a big surprise. However, the fact that the mention of “kids” jumped by a factor of five this year is rather dramatic. It’s tough to know what this means, though. (via Facebook Unveils Most-Mentioned Topics of 2009

)

January 15, 2010 » 01:36 PM

BEYOND AWESOME. They are announcing a recall of the Plush Uterus “due to a potential choking hazard for children”. To apply for it, “Please send an email to the address below with the subject line, ‘UTERUS OPT OUT’”.

January 14, 2010 » 10:04 PM

“To order, please TYPE “YES” IN CHECKBOX BELOW TO AGREE YOU UNDERSTAND THIS PLUSH MUST BE KEPT AWAY FROM KIDS (it is a sex organ, after all). If it is not checked, WE WILL NOT SEND THE UTERUS.” (via @ibogost)

January 11, 2010 » 01:45 PM

I watched Space: 1999 back in the day, but I swear to god I do not remember this scene.

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson