The mouse that roared

A while ago, my wife showed me a teen-girl book called Fearless: A Girl Born Without The Fear Gene. The hero is a teenager who doesn't feel fear, a fact that transforms her into this totally awesome crime-fighter. I howled with laughter when I saw the title -- because, of course, human genetics are so crazily complex that the idea of linking an emotional state to a specific gene is utterly crappy science, right?
Whoops. Turns out that a couple of scientists just discovered that when you knock the gene strathmin out of mice, they're much less fearful -- and much more brave. As the New Scientist reports:
In the experiments, the stathmin-lacking mice wandered out into the centre of an open box, in defiance of the normal mouse instinct to hide along the box's walls to avoid potential predators.
And to test learned fear, the mice were exposed to a loud sound followed by a brief electric shock from the floor below them. A day later, normal mice froze when the sound was played again. Stathmin-lacking mice barely reacted to the sound at all.
Apparently, Strathmin is located primarily in the amyglada, a brain area crucial to the regulation of fear. If the scientists can figure out more precisely what's going on, they could potentially design drugs to help people who suffer from persistent anxiety disorders. Or pharmaceutically create a legion of crazed soldiers unafraid to die!! It reminds me of the drug Dylar in Don DeLillo's White Noise, which would relieve patients of any fear of death, with one curious side effect: If you spoke a suggestive descriptive phrase out loud, they would vividly hallucinate it as if it were real.
(Thanks to Slashdot for this one!)
Posted by Clive Thompson at November 18, 2005 10:12 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1366
Aside: The notion of saying that an emotion is "defined" by a gene makes no sense not because of the genetics, but because of language and semantics. People hold many ideas about the scope of emotions like "fear" and "shyness," and to tie such feelings to a materialist base such as a physical gene narrows the word. We need a moratorium on phrases such as "the shy gene," and must always understand that some gene may be an indicator of something some people associate with their idea of shyness: but not much more.
Posted by: xertroyt at November 19, 2005 8:08 AM
Good point -- emotions are subject things.
Posted by: Clive at November 21, 2005 4:17 PM
'brave' is a bit of a subjective interpretation of the observed mouse behavior. 'stupid' seems equally applicable.
Posted by: Bram at November 25, 2005 4:01 AM
Post a comment
Aside: The notion of saying that an emotion is "defined" by a gene makes no sense not because of the genetics, but because of language and semantics. People hold many ideas about the scope of emotions like "fear" and "shyness," and to tie such feelings to a materialist base such as a physical gene narrows the word. We need a moratorium on phrases such as "the shy gene," and must always understand that some gene may be an indicator of something some people associate with their idea of shyness: but not much more.
Posted by: xertroyt
at November 19, 2005 8:08 AM
Good point -- emotions are subject things.
Posted by: Clive
at November 21, 2005 4:17 PM
'brave' is a bit of a subjective interpretation of the observed mouse behavior. 'stupid' seems equally applicable.
Posted by: Bram
at November 25, 2005 4:01 AM