FREE counter and Web statistics from sitetracker.com
collision detection
content | discontent
send me yours
December 07, 2005
Telepresence paintball game lets you shoot chicks in bikinis over the Internet










Some times, you really don't need a clever headline, eh? No, just the straight, plain, incredibly weird facts.

Anyway, here's the backstory: Last year I blogged about Live-shot, a Texas company that let you take control of a gun on the Internet and go hunting. Legislators, predictably, freaked out, and a few months later the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission voted unanimously "to ban remote hunting for game animals," as The Dallas Morning News reported. The CEO of Live-shot, John Lockwood, claimed this was discrimination because he had a paying customer who was wheelchair-bound and wanted to use the system to hunt a bit 'o buck. The new rules require that "anyone hunting a game animal or bird be physically present and in control of the firearm", so Lockwood actually built a wheelchair-stand on his property in Texas, from which anyone in a wheelchair can take control of the Live-shot technology and use it for hunting. In essence, they'll still be hunting via telepresence, but from only a couple of feet away -- thus obeying the letter, if not the spirit, of the law.

I figured this exercise in Second Amendment surreality had run its course, until I checked into Gizmodo today to discover that Lockwood has started a new business: A remote-control paintball gun that netizens can use to shoot at bikini-clad chicks. As you might expect, he put up a teaser video, and as you might expect, it is both intentionally silly and unintentionally creepy. And then there's the FAQ!

Q: Can I have my wife run through the field so I can paintball her?

A: It's surprising how many requests we've had for this one! Including, girlfriends, husbands, significant others. Also, exes. Hey, we have a new theme here! Send them out to us, or send a blow up of their picture for target practice, and send her / him a copy of your session on DVD!

I actually thought I'd have some witty comment to make on this one, but it all seems kind of superfluous. Ken Goldberg, my brain needs watering.


(Thanks to Gizmodo for this one!)

Posted by Clive Thompson at December 07, 2005 08:01 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1388

Comments

this thing really is so incredibly weird. I love the idea of remote anything. But why hunting of all things? And then, why follow it up with paintball. I know this Lockwood guy is from Texas, but clearly he has a thing for guns.

But clearly, the guy has a creative business plan. I'd hate to see what would happen if he hooked up with Troy Hurtubise.

Posted by: Steve E. [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 7, 2005 10:51 PM

Hurtubise! Man, now that guy would make an interesting target.

Posted by: Clive [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 7, 2005 11:21 PM

Um, didn't this appear in the news already a couple of years ago and turned out to be a hoax? I clearly remember reading about it; is this a different guy?

Posted by: PaulJBis [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2005 6:44 AM

Shoot goo over bikini clad women? No thanks.

Posted by: vbfg [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2005 8:44 AM

Just wanted to add another superfluous comment. I actually remember reading about the remote hunting business, and I was even slightly sympathetic to the idea that it was for the benefit of wheelchair-bound hunters. Who the hell is the target audience for this thing, though? Wheelchair-bound misogynists?

Posted by: Stephen Stralka [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2005 1:27 PM

I believe the hoax you're speaking of was the "Hunting For Bambi" site, which promised to let you hunt a woman through the forest using paintball guns -- and then record it on DVD for posterity. I blogged about that hoax a couple of years back.

This one seems to be real, though I'd be willing to believe it's a hoax if proof came up ... it certainly feels prank-like.

Posted by: Clive [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2005 1:35 PM

shouldn't she be wearing eye protection?

That is *so* wrong, but I still laughed.

Now, *I'd* pay for one that offered guys dressed in costumes of political figures. Nixon, for instance. Or... well, you can imagine. I'm sure there'd be a huge market on both sides of any political fence.

Posted by: johntunger [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2005 2:42 PM

Let's not forget the other classic paintball hoax - ">Columbine Paintball.

Posted by: garthbreaks [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2005 1:13 PM

Oops, try www.columbinepaintball.com

Posted by: garthbreaks [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2005 1:17 PM

John, heh.

Columbine paintball!! I'd not heard of that one!

Posted by: Clive [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2005 3:07 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

NOTE: If you posted a comment and you can't see it -- try refreshing your browser.


Remember me?