Do “mirror neurons” teach us violence from violent media?

Back in 1996, some Italian scientists wanted to study how the neurons in monkey brains planned and carried out movements. So they put probes into the monkeys and began monitoring their cerebral activity. Then something weird happened: A student came into the lab with an ice cream cone, and, while the monkeys watched, lifted it to his mouth. Simultaneously, the monkeys’ movement neurons all began firing. It was as if the monkeys themselves were lifting the cone to their own mouths.

The scientists had discovered “mirror neurons” — specialized brain cells that fire mimetically whenever an animal or human witnesses a movement. There’s a superb story on them in this week’s New York Times Science section, and it reports that researchers today now believe that mirror neurons are involved in some very complex behaviors. For example, they allow athletes to train themselves merely by watching others execute complex physical manouevers. And mirror neurons might even be involved in empathy — because when we see someone in distress our cells mirror their emotional state. As Giacomo Rizzolatti, one of the Italian neuroscientists who made the discovery, puts it: “Mirror neurons allow us to grasp the minds of others not through conceptual reasoning but through direct simulation. By feeling, not by thinking.” People who rank high on empathy scales tend to have particularly active mirror-neuron clusters in their brains.

But here’s where things get interesting. If our mirror neurons “learn” behavior by watching it, what happens when we view violent or pornographic media? The article ruminates on this a bit, noting that …

… a study in the January 2006 issue of Media Psychology found that when children watched violent television programs, mirror neurons, as well as several brain regions involved in aggression were activated, increasing the probability that the children would behave violently. [snip]

In yet another realm, mirror neurons are powerfully activated by pornography, several scientists said. For example, when a man watches another man have sexual intercourse with a woman, the observer’s mirror neurons spring into action. The vicarious thrill of watching sex, it turns out, is not so vicarious after all.

I tried to find the Media Psychology study mentioned above, but it doesn’t appear to be online — though some googling made me suspect it was done by Celia Heyes, a professor of psychology at University College London, who’s done a lot of work on the evolution of cognition. If anyone can find a copy of the paper, email and let me know: I’d love to read it!


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

A long German word for “noticing when ads are being customized based on your surfing history”

Gay squid sex

“El Ajedrecista” — an analog chess-playing computer from 1912

Hacking the Model T

“How did you find my site?” and Vannevar Bush’s memex

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

May 20, 2011 » 02:28 PM

From Christopher Kennedy’s very droll book “Neitzsche’s Horse”.

July 28, 2010 » 07:35 AM
“Wr” - S

July 06, 2010 » 10:05 AM

My Xbox broke, and I was trying to Google some possible technical solutions, when I noticed that Google appears to be encouraging me to make a typo. I suppose it’s possible that Google’s algorithms know that typing “wont” instead of “won’t” would produce better results.

June 29, 2010 » 05:00 PM

On the other hand, when I tried the test for multitasking, I was pretty abysmal. I performed worse than people who identify themselves as heavy multitaskers, and those who identify as low multitaskers.

June 29, 2010 » 04:58 PM

I finally got around to trying out the interactive “test your distractability and multitasking” page at the New York Times, which they put up alongside their story earlier this month about how computer distractions are eroding our lives. 

According to the test, I guess I have good focus — I’m not very distractable! 

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson