« PREVIOUS ENTRY
Stephen Harper eats babies!

“Ringxiety”: Why you sometimes hear “phantom” mobile-phone rings

Ever heard of “ringxiety”? It’s a neologism for a phenomonen that, according to last week’s Styles section in the New York Times, is occurring more and more: A nagging sense that you can hear your mobile phone ringing when it actually isn’t.

This happens to me all the time! Often when I’m running the water in the sink in my bathroom, I’ll be convinced I can hear my mobile ringing. I rush out into the living room and — nothing. Other sounds that trigger it for me include the ride cymbal in songs from Sheryl Crow’s self-titled album, and certain traffic noises from 6th Ave. outside my window.

As it turns out, there’s some interesting science behind ringxiety, as the Times reports:

The ear gives unequal weights to certain frequencies, making it particularly sensitive to sounds in the range of 1,000 to 6,000 hertz, scientists say. Babies cry in this range, for example, and the familiar “brrring, brrring” ringtone hits this sweet spot, too. (Simple ringtones are more likely to produce phantom rings than popular music used as a ringtone.) [snip]

“It’s a 1,000 hertz tone that can be generated by just about anything,” Mr. Jenkins said. And because most sounds are the result of two or more tones put together — human speech is multitonal, for example — simple tones really stand out.

What’s more, tones generated around 1,000 hertz are also really hard to spatially locate. Humans locate sounds based on their frequency: We pinpoint high-pitched sounds based on their volume level, and low frequency sounds based on their arrival time in our ears. But 1,000-hertz noises fall into an acoustic blind spot in this system, which means “a noise in that range seems just as likely to be coming from the television to the right as a purse sitting to the left.”

I’ve become so addled by these auditory quirks that if I’m particularly anxious or stressed out, I sometimes find myself literally hallucinating mobile-phone sounds when I lie in bed. Surrounded by relative silence, I’ll imagine that I’m hearing the “arriving text-message alert” sound, which in my case is a quiet, burbling techno sequence that ends with a few filtered noises precisely in that 1,000-hertz range. I’d like to think that I’m being hoaxed by a trick sound, but honestly I think that in this situation, the sounds are completely inside my head: A form of madness unique to the digital era.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

A long German word for “noticing when ads are being customized based on your surfing history”

Gay squid sex

“El Ajedrecista” — an analog chess-playing computer from 1912

Hacking the Model T

“How did you find my site?” and Vannevar Bush’s memex

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

May 20, 2011 » 02:28 PM

From Christopher Kennedy’s very droll book “Neitzsche’s Horse”.

July 28, 2010 » 07:35 AM
“Wr” - S

July 06, 2010 » 10:05 AM

My Xbox broke, and I was trying to Google some possible technical solutions, when I noticed that Google appears to be encouraging me to make a typo. I suppose it’s possible that Google’s algorithms know that typing “wont” instead of “won’t” would produce better results.

June 29, 2010 » 05:00 PM

On the other hand, when I tried the test for multitasking, I was pretty abysmal. I performed worse than people who identify themselves as heavy multitaskers, and those who identify as low multitaskers.

June 29, 2010 » 04:58 PM

I finally got around to trying out the interactive “test your distractability and multitasking” page at the New York Times, which they put up alongside their story earlier this month about how computer distractions are eroding our lives. 

According to the test, I guess I have good focus — I’m not very distractable! 

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson