Times story on the 639-year-long John Cage organ performance

Three years ago, I blogged about a performance of John Cage’s “As Slow As Possible” — a piece of organ music that he intended to be played, uh, as slow as possible. The first-ever staging of the piece lasted 29 minutes. Now a group of Germans are taking it to a logical extreme: Their performance will last 639 years. Back in 2003, the only sound audible was the gentle wheeze of the organ’s bellows being inflated, a process that took 17 months.

But now the audible music is going, and the New York Times has a terrific piece about it today:

Like the imperceptible movement of a glacier, a chord change was planned for Friday. Two pipes were to be removed from the rudimentary organ (which is being built as the piece goes on, with pipes added and subtracted as needed), eliminating a pair of E’s. Cage devotees, musicians and the curious have trickled in to Halberstadt, a town about two and a half hours southwest of Berlin by train known as the birthplace of canned hot dogs and home to a collection of 18,000 stuffed birds.

“In these times, acceleration spoils everything,” said Heinz-Klaus Metzger, a prominent musicologist whose chance comments at an organ conference nine years ago sparked the project. “To begin a performance with the perspective of more than a half-millennium —it’s just a kind of negation of the lifestyle of today.”

Apparently they’re placing weights on the organ’s keys to keep the notes sounding, and they’ve rigged a solar-panel array to the organ’s power supply so that an electrical outage won’t stop the performance. This latter fact, is, of course, what’s so “Clock of the Long Now” about this performance: When you plan a project that’s going to last for 639 years, you have to really think ahead.

By my calculations, assuming my progeny continue to have progeny, my 60th great-grandchild will be around to hear the song end.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

A long German word for “noticing when ads are being customized based on your surfing history”

Gay squid sex

“El Ajedrecista” — an analog chess-playing computer from 1912

Hacking the Model T

“How did you find my site?” and Vannevar Bush’s memex

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

May 20, 2011 » 02:28 PM

From Christopher Kennedy’s very droll book “Neitzsche’s Horse”.

July 28, 2010 » 07:35 AM
“Wr” - S

July 06, 2010 » 10:05 AM

My Xbox broke, and I was trying to Google some possible technical solutions, when I noticed that Google appears to be encouraging me to make a typo. I suppose it’s possible that Google’s algorithms know that typing “wont” instead of “won’t” would produce better results.

June 29, 2010 » 05:00 PM

On the other hand, when I tried the test for multitasking, I was pretty abysmal. I performed worse than people who identify themselves as heavy multitaskers, and those who identify as low multitaskers.

June 29, 2010 » 04:58 PM

I finally got around to trying out the interactive “test your distractability and multitasking” page at the New York Times, which they put up alongside their story earlier this month about how computer distractions are eroding our lives. 

According to the test, I guess I have good focus — I’m not very distractable! 

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson