How squid helped whales evolve echolocation

As most connoisseurs of whale trivia know, all “toothed” whales echolocate — they hunt underwater prey via reflected sound waves. In contrast, all baleen whales — which hunt krill by straining them through seive-like mandibles — do not echolocate. Why the difference?

Marine evolutionary biologists have long assumed it’s because toothed whales dive down deep to hunt prey at night, whereas baleen whales stay near the surface. Since it’s so insanely pitch-black down there, the toothed whales had to evolve echolocation merely to be able to navigate.

For years, this explanation made perfect sense. Still, the biologists were puzzled by one unanswered question: How did the toothed whales know there was food down below?

Because they followed the squid. Many squid rise up to the ocean surface during the night, and plunge down deep during the day. In a recent paper, David Lindberg — the UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology — used fossil records of ancient whales and squid to argue that the toothed whales probably followed the squid down deeper and deeper until they realized there’s a massive buffet of squid kicking around in the ocean’s basement. At which point they also were like, damn, we’re gonna need us some echolocation to fully harvest this squid bonanza.

As a story in Science Daily reports:

Lindberg and Pyenson propose that whales first found it possible to track these hard-shelled creatures in surface waters at night by bouncing sounds off of them, an advantage over whales that relied only on moonlight or starlight.

This would have enabled whales to follow the cephalopods as they migrated downwards into the darkness during the day. Today, the largest number of squid hang out during the day at about 500 meters below the surface, though some go twice as deep. During the night, however, nearly half the squid are within 150 meters of the surface.

Squid: Noble pistons in the engine of marine evolution.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

A long German word for “noticing when ads are being customized based on your surfing history”

Gay squid sex

“El Ajedrecista” — an analog chess-playing computer from 1912

Hacking the Model T

“How did you find my site?” and Vannevar Bush’s memex

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

May 20, 2011 » 02:28 PM

From Christopher Kennedy’s very droll book “Neitzsche’s Horse”.

July 28, 2010 » 07:35 AM
“Wr” - S

July 06, 2010 » 10:05 AM

My Xbox broke, and I was trying to Google some possible technical solutions, when I noticed that Google appears to be encouraging me to make a typo. I suppose it’s possible that Google’s algorithms know that typing “wont” instead of “won’t” would produce better results.

June 29, 2010 » 05:00 PM

On the other hand, when I tried the test for multitasking, I was pretty abysmal. I performed worse than people who identify themselves as heavy multitaskers, and those who identify as low multitaskers.

June 29, 2010 » 04:58 PM

I finally got around to trying out the interactive “test your distractability and multitasking” page at the New York Times, which they put up alongside their story earlier this month about how computer distractions are eroding our lives. 

According to the test, I guess I have good focus — I’m not very distractable! 

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson