« PREVIOUS ENTRY
“Bloodvertising”

NEXT ENTRY »
Neologisms R Us

What brand are you?

So. You want to have a personal brand name. Who doesn’t? But there’s one problem: You haven’t got $7 million kicking around so that a bunch of liberal-arts legacy assholes from Brown can get paid six figures to sit around playing Grand Theft Auto while they “develop” your brand concept. Hey, this sort of quality brand management is available only to companies with deep pockets and shallow vision.

But now you, too, can develop your own personal brand — with one mouse click! Hie thee to the What Brand Are You? page at The Design Conspiracy, and fill in your name with a few basic atttributes. Presto: It’ll give you a new corporate name, and explain the connotations.

I entered “Clive Thompson” for my name, “anarchy” as my core value, and “client satisfaction” as my “core goal”.

My personal brand name? “Vere”. What this brand name connotes? The value is “maybe, maybe”.

(Thanks to Rob Walker’s “Murketing”, via Jeff MacIntye!)


blog comments powered by Disqus

Search This Site


Bio:

I'm Clive Thompson, a writer on science, technology, and culture. This blog collects bits of offbeat research I'm running into, and musings thereon.

Currently, I'm a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and a columnist for Wired magazine. I also write for Fast Company and Wired magazine's web site, among other places. Email or AOL IM me (pomeranian99) to say hi or send in something strange!

More of Me

Twitter
Tumblr
Flickr


Recent Entries

A long German word for “noticing when ads are being customized based on your surfing history”

Gay squid sex

“El Ajedrecista” — an analog chess-playing computer from 1912

Hacking the Model T

“How did you find my site?” and Vannevar Bush’s memex

» visit the Collision Detection archives

Clive Thompson's Tumblr
a bunch of stuff

May 20, 2011 » 02:28 PM

From Christopher Kennedy’s very droll book “Neitzsche’s Horse”.

July 28, 2010 » 07:35 AM
“Wr” - S

July 06, 2010 » 10:05 AM

My Xbox broke, and I was trying to Google some possible technical solutions, when I noticed that Google appears to be encouraging me to make a typo. I suppose it’s possible that Google’s algorithms know that typing “wont” instead of “won’t” would produce better results.

June 29, 2010 » 05:00 PM

On the other hand, when I tried the test for multitasking, I was pretty abysmal. I performed worse than people who identify themselves as heavy multitaskers, and those who identify as low multitaskers.

June 29, 2010 » 04:58 PM

I finally got around to trying out the interactive “test your distractability and multitasking” page at the New York Times, which they put up alongside their story earlier this month about how computer distractions are eroding our lives. 

According to the test, I guess I have good focus — I’m not very distractable! 

» visit my Tumblr

Recent Comments

Photos

» see all of my photos on Flickr

Collision Detection: A Blog by Clive Thompson